Michael D. Applegate

595 citations
11 papers · 536 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. Applegate

11 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Michael D. Applegate
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Developmental Neuroscience 106
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 370
  • Neurology 93
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 33
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 133
Replace Steven F. Hoff with:
Steven F. Hoff United States
Bruce H. Wainer United States
A M Szekely United States
R. Jork Germany
Keiko Tominaga‐Yoshino Japan
Debra A. Evenson United States
Willem‐Hendrik Gispen Netherlands
Alessandro Ciamei Italy
Kazuho Abe Japan
Mia Mikkonen Finland
Michael D. Applegate relative to Steven F. Hoff United States Steven F. Hoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Steven F. Hoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Applegate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Applegate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Applegate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Applegate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Applegate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Applegate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Applegate. The network helps show where Michael D. Applegate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Applegate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Applegate Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Applegate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1986139
2 199198
3 199075
4 198964
5 198761
6 199548
7 199126
8 199112
9
Behavioral, cellular, and molecular biological studies of aged nonhuman primates.
19905
10 19954
11 19904

About Michael D. Applegate

Michael D. Applegate is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (106 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (370 citations), Neurology (93 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (33 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (133 citations). Michael D. Applegate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. W. Landfield, Thomas A. Pitler, Donald L. Price, Vassilis E. Koliatsos, Philip W. Landfield, Douglas S. Kerr, Ivan Lieberburg, Paul N. Hoffman, Nancy A. Muma and Lary C. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact