G.H. Wolf

2.5k citations
69 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

G.H. Wolf

65 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

G.H. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 665
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 85
  • Catalysis 130
  • Materials Chemistry 697
  • Condensed Matter Physics 129
Replace J. A. Schouten with:
J. A. Schouten Netherlands
P. C. Souers United States
Yumin Wang China
R.H. Sherman United States
M. B. Mason United Kingdom
H. M. Roder United States
Robert F. Berg United States
Dwain E. Diller United States
E. Rachlew Sweden
Francesco Ancilotto Italy
G.H. Wolf relative to J. A. Schouten Netherlands J. A. Schouten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12.1×
J. A. Schouten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.H. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.H. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.H. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.H. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.H. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.H. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.H. Wolf. The network helps show where G.H. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.H. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.H. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together G.H. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990139
2 1969135
3 1970109
4 200697
5 199188
6 198176
7 199060
8 199949
9 199847
10 199941
11 198933
12 197231
13 201828
14 199727
15 198126
16 198924
17 197420
18 197719
19 199618
20 198716

About G.H. Wolf

G.H. Wolf is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (28 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (17 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (14 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (7 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (6 papers) and Hydrogen Storage and Materials (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (665 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (85 citations), Catalysis (130 citations), Materials Chemistry (697 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (129 citations). G.H. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include D. Reiter, H. Kever, W. Feneberg, K. Bohmhammel, K.H. Finken, K.H. Finken, J.C. van Miltenburg, Martine Baelmans, R. Schneider and R. Behrisch. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Physical Review Letters and Fusion Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact