Michael Colditz

765 citations
18 papers · 530 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Colditz

14 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Michael Colditz
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental Neuroscience 169
  • Neurology 144
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Genetics 95
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
Replace Nina Hellström Erkenstam with:
Nina Hellström Erkenstam Sweden
Ildikó Szalayova United States
Ursula Graumann Switzerland
Nadia Sachewsky Canada
Zhaoxia Duan China
Ditte Gry Ellman Denmark
Ali H. Zahalka United States
Carla Weis United States
Mathilde S. A. Deloire France
Melania Cusimano Italy
Michael Colditz relative to Nina Hellström Erkenstam Sweden Nina Hellström Erkenstam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Nina Hellström Erkenstam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Colditz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Colditz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Colditz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Colditz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Colditz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Colditz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Colditz. The network helps show where Michael Colditz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Colditz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Colditz Line = papers co-authored together Michael Colditz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2012190
2 201281
3 201281
4 200870
5 201927
6 200925
7 201422
8 202213
9 20099
10 20086
11
Neurophysiological effects of substance P in primate hypertension models. Preliminary report.
19902
12 20241
13 20231
14 19841
15 19741
16 20240
17 20200
18 20130

About Michael Colditz

Michael Colditz is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (169 citations), Neurology (144 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Genetics (95 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations). Michael Colditz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rosalind L. Jeffree, Perry F. Bartlett, Marc J. Ruitenberg, Daniel G. Blackmore, Jana Vukovic, Elizabeth J. Coulson, Vibeke S. Catts, Thomas H.J. Burne, Melissa Lai and Paul B. Colditz. Their work appears in journals such as Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Journal of Neuroscience, Cell Reports, European Journal of Neuroscience and Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact