Michael Chow

22 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers

Michael Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Sensory Systems 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 89
  • Otorhinolaryngology 18
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 37
Replace Hongmei Yan with:
Hongmei Yan China
Jing Lv China
Pengcheng Xi Canada
Shun‐Chi Wu Taiwan
Pablo Duque Colombia
Sheng‐Chieh Huang Taiwan
Huasheng Liu China
Zhiqiang Guo China
Shaozhen Chen China
Vooi Voon Yap Malaysia
Michael Chow relative to Hongmei Yan China Hongmei Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Hongmei Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Chow. The network helps show where Michael Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Chow Line = papers co-authored together Michael Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011178
2 201689
3 201568
4 201639
5 201532
6 201528
7 202227
8 201821
9 201612
10 202210
11 20237
12 20215
13 19734
14 20234
15 20233
16 20232
17 20201
18 20241
19 20221
20 20231

About Michael Chow

Michael Chow is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations), Sensory Systems (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (18 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (37 citations). Michael Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew R. A. Conway, Brooke N. Macnamara, Corentin Gonthier, Todd S. Braver, Jenny K.W. Lam, Haimonti Dutta, Albert Boulanger, David L. Waltz, Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi and Cynthia Rudin. Their work appears in journals such as Head & Neck, The Laryngoscope, JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Memory & Cognition and Placenta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact