Michael C. Stokes
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
Papers in
- Philosophy 12
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 12
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 3
- Co-authors
- W. K. C. Guthrie (2 shared papers)Nicholas White (1 shared paper)Peter Murray (1 shared paper)Charles H. Large (1 shared paper)Sipke H. Wadman (1 shared paper)Carole M. Stubbs (1 shared paper)G.M. Robertson (1 shared paper)Martin R. Johnson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Phronesis (3 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (2 papers)The Classical World (2 papers)Phoenix (2 papers)Polis The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael C. Stokes
16 papers receiving 103 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Philosophy 100
- Anthropology 61
- Archeology 52
- History and Philosophy of Science 20
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Stokes
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Stokes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Stokes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Stokes. The network helps show where Michael C. Stokes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 35 | |
| 2 | 1972 | 27 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1963 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 7 | Dialectic in Action: An Examination of Plato's Crito | 2005 | 8 |
| 8 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1962 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 0 |
About Michael C. Stokes
Michael C. Stokes is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Archeology, Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (1 paper) and Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (100 citations), Anthropology (61 citations), Archeology (52 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Michael C. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include W. K. C. Guthrie, Nicholas White, Peter Murray, Charles H. Large, Sipke H. Wadman, Carole M. Stubbs, G.M. Robertson, Martin R. Johnson, Ann G. Hayes and D. I. C. SCOPES. Their work appears in journals such as Phronesis, The Philosophical Quarterly, The Classical World, Phoenix and Polis The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.