Michael C. Denham
Impact in
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses 5
-
- Advanced Statistical Methods and Models 4
- Co-authors
- Daniel Barker (3 shared papers)Richard M. Sibly (3 shared papers)Mark Pagel (3 shared papers)Jim Hone (3 shared papers)David J. Balding (2 shared papers)Gráinne McGuire (2 shared papers)Neil A. Butler (1 shared paper)Philip J. Brown (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Chemometrics (4 papers)Science (3 papers)Bioinformatics (1 paper)Molecular Biology and Evolution (1 paper)Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael C. Denham
10 papers receiving 613 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Analytical Chemistry 156
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 149
- Statistics and Probability 89
- Ecology 225
- Ecological Modeling 35
Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Denham
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Denham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Denham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Denham. The network helps show where Michael C. Denham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 364 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 44 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 0 |
About Michael C. Denham
Michael C. Denham is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Statistics and Probability, Ecology, Molecular Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 11 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (2 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (156 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (149 citations), Statistics and Probability (89 citations), Ecology (225 citations) and Ecological Modeling (35 citations). Michael C. Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Barker, Richard M. Sibly, Mark Pagel, Jim Hone, David J. Balding, Gráinne McGuire, Neil A. Butler, Philip J. Brown and Clifford H. Spiegelman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemometrics, Science, Bioinformatics, Molecular Biology and Evolution and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.