Michael Boyle

2.6k citations
60 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Boyle

57 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Boyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Communication 547
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 293
  • Literature and Literary Theory 166
  • Education 438
  • Sociology and Political Science 606
Replace Rachel Grieve with:
Rachel Grieve Australia
Daniel G. Krutka United States
Chia‐chen Yang United States
Martin Tanis Netherlands
Lawrence R. Frey United States
Elisabeth Hayes United States
Regina Jucks Germany
Pamela J. McKenzie Canada
Chi Baik Australia
Ge Gao United States
Michael Boyle relative to Rachel Grieve Australia Rachel Grieve's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Rachel Grieve · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Boyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Boyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Boyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Boyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Boyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Boyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Boyle. The network helps show where Michael Boyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Boyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Boyle Line = papers co-authored together Michael Boyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009333
2 2003138
3 2012104
4 2004100
5 202069
6 202158
7 200758
8 200453
9 200952
10 200850
11 200947
12 201042
13 200942
14 201140
15 200839
16 201936
17 200535
18 201135
19 200635
20 200634

About Michael Boyle

Michael Boyle is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (15 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (547 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (293 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (166 citations), Education (438 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (606 citations). Michael Boyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robyn M. Gillies, Douglas M. McLeod, Mike Schmierbach, Cory L. Armstrong, Dhavan V. Shah, Zhongdang Pan, Michael McCluskey, Alyssa Appelman, Jaeho Cho and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. Their work appears in journals such as Mass Communication & Society, American Behavioral Scientist, Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Communication and Strength and conditioning journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact