Michael Boyle

2.6k citations
61 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Boyle

58 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Boyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Communication 537
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 292
  • Literature and Literary Theory 168
  • Education 439
  • Sociology and Political Science 608
Replace Shu Ching Yang with:
Shu Ching Yang Taiwan
Katie Davis United States
Rachel Grieve Australia
Chia‐chen Yang United States
Regina Jucks Germany
Martin Tanis Netherlands
Kenneth J. Levine United States
Lawrence R. Frey United States
David Šmahel Czechia
Aaron W. Smith United States
Michael Boyle relative to Shu Ching Yang Taiwan Shu Ching Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Shu Ching Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Boyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Boyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Boyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Boyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Boyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Boyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Boyle. The network helps show where Michael Boyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Boyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Boyle Line = papers co-authored together Michael Boyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009328
2 2003138
3 2012101
4 200497
5 202067
6 200758
7 202156
8 200850
9 200450
10 200949
11 200947
12 201042
13 200940
14 201140
15 200839
16 200535
17 200635
18 201934
19 200634
20 201134

About Michael Boyle

Michael Boyle is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (15 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Media Influence and Health (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (537 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (292 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (168 citations), Education (439 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (608 citations). Michael Boyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robyn M. Gillies, Douglas M. McLeod, Mike Schmierbach, Cory L. Armstrong, Dhavan V. Shah, Zhongdang Pan, Michael McCluskey, Jaeho Cho, Heejo Keum and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. Their work appears in journals such as Mass Communication & Society, Journal of Communication, American Behavioral Scientist, Teaching and Teacher Education and Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact