Michael Auer

130 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Michael Auer
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Clinical Psychology 1.0k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 763
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 45
  • Neurology 369
  • Marketing 190
Replace Maureen J. O’Sullivan with:
Maureen J. O’Sullivan Ireland
Amy K. Kiefer United States
Daniel Connolly United Kingdom
L. Jacobs United States
Ilaria Castelli Italy
Masahiro Toda Japan
Robin L. Bennett United States
Eric Anderson United States
Ingrid Winship Australia
David Jackson United States
Michael Auer relative to Maureen J. O’Sullivan Ireland Maureen J. O’Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45×
Maureen J. O’Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Auer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Auer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Auer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Auer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Auer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Auer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Auer. The network helps show where Michael Auer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Auer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Auer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Auer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012120
2 201778
3 201672
4 201568
5 202067
6 201566
7 201463
8 201562
9 200656
10 201655
11 201653
12 200551
13 200450
14 201650
15 201949
16 200548
17 202047
18 202147
19 201343
20 200542

About Michael Auer

Michael Auer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Neurology, Oncology and Rheumatology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (55 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (46 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (28 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (21 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (15 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (14 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (12 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (763 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (45 citations), Neurology (369 citations) and Marketing (190 citations). Michael Auer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Griffiths, Florian Deisenhammer, Harald Hegen, Franziska Di Pauli, Gabriel Bsteh, Thomas Berger, Klaus Berek, Sebastian Wurth, Anne Zinganell and K. H. Nicolaides. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gambling Studies, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, European Journal of Neurology, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact