Michael Auer

4.4k citations
136 papers · 3.0k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Auer

130 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Michael Auer
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 721
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 44
  • Applied Psychology 120
  • General Decision Sciences 45
Replace Maureen J. O’Sullivan with:
Maureen J. O’Sullivan Ireland
Ilaria Castelli Italy
Eric Anderson United States
Amy K. Kiefer United States
Masahiro Toda Japan
Mark J. Benson United States
David Jackson United States
James A. Russell United States
Jens Nygren Sweden
David R. Thomson Canada
Michael Auer relative to Maureen J. O’Sullivan Ireland Maureen J. O’Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×44×
Maureen J. O’Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Auer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Auer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Auer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Auer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Auer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Auer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Auer. The network helps show where Michael Auer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Auer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Auer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Auer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012148
2 201699
3 201595
4 201589
5 201486
6 201781
7 201679
8 202071
9 201571
10 200659
11 201359
12 201656
13 200455
14 201654
15 200554
16 201953
17 200552
18 201250
19 202050
20 202149

About Michael Auer

Michael Auer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing and Oncology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (46 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (43 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (26 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (15 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (11 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (9 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (721 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (44 citations), Applied Psychology (120 citations) and General Decision Sciences (45 citations). Michael Auer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Griffiths, Florian Deisenhammer, Harald Hegen, Franziska Di Pauli, Gabriel Bsteh, Thomas Berger, Klaus Berek, Sebastian Wurth, Anne Zinganell and K. H. Nicolaides. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gambling Studies, European Journal of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact