Michael Ariel

1.6k citations
64 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Ariel

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Ariel
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 965
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 483
  • Neurology 125
  • Ophthalmology 111
  • Molecular Biology 923
Replace N. W. Daw with:
N. W. Daw United States
Chie‐Fang Hsiao United States
L. R. Stanford United States
R. E. Soodak United States
V.A. Casagrande United States
Shigang He China
Larry A. Palmer United States
Robert Siminoff United States
Karl Farrow Belgium
Martin Wilson United States
Michael Ariel relative to N. W. Daw United States N. W. Daw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
N. W. Daw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ariel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ariel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ariel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ariel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ariel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ariel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ariel. The network helps show where Michael Ariel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ariel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Ariel Line = papers co-authored together Michael Ariel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982250
2 1982142
3 198365
4 198561
5 198460
6 199053
7 199539
8 198537
9 197837
10 198333
11 197733
12 199130
13 198625
14 199821
15 198819
16 198119
17 198219
18 199018
19 199718
20 199016

About Michael Ariel

Michael Ariel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Ophthalmology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (36 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (20 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (15 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (965 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (483 citations), Neurology (125 citations), Ophthalmology (111 citations) and Molecular Biology (923 citations). Michael Ariel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include N. W. Daw, Nigel W. Daw, Alexander F. Rosenberg, Naoki Kogo, Alan R. Adolph, Ryan K. Rader, Stuart C. Mangel, John E. Dowling, Michael A. Sandberg and Eric M. Lasater. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research, Visual Neuroscience, Vision Research and Experimental Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact