Michael A. Forster

772 citations
22 papers · 570 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael A. Forster

22 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Michael A. Forster
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Global and Planetary Change 445
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 172
  • Atmospheric Science 224
  • Soil Science 69
  • Plant Science 214
Replace Dominik Sperlich with:
Dominik Sperlich Spain
Ava R. Howard United States
Takafumi Miyama Japan
David M. Love United States
Heidi J. Renninger United States
Mitja Ferlan Slovenia
Mauro Brum Brazil
Alexandra C. Correia Portugal
Toshihiro Umebayashi Japan
David Aguadé Spain
Michael A. Forster relative to Dominik Sperlich Spain Dominik Sperlich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dominik Sperlich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Forster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Forster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Forster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Forster. The network helps show where Michael A. Forster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Forster Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Forster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014110
2 201155
3 201746
4 201145
5 201743
6 201837
7 200828
8 202028
9 201326
10 201025
11 201924
12 201823
13 201022
14 202217
15 200913
16 20128
17 20166
18 20215
19 20224
20 19852

About Michael A. Forster

Michael A. Forster is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (17 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (10 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (3 papers), Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (3 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (2 papers) and Irrigation Practices and Water Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (445 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (172 citations), Atmospheric Science (224 citations), Soil Science (69 citations) and Plant Science (214 citations). Michael A. Forster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Bonser, Augustine Doronila, Brenton Ladd, David T. Tissue, Derek Eamus, Remko A. Duursma, Craig V. M. Barton, Belinda E. Medlyn, David S. Ellsworth and Qi Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Forests, Annals of Botany, Journal of Hydrology and Water Resources Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact