M.H. Booster

1.3k citations
38 papers · 951 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M.H. Booster

38 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

M.H. Booster
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Transplantation 251
  • Hepatology 160
  • Surgery 709
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 354
  • Developmental Neuroscience 22
Replace Mark-Hugo J. Maathuis with:
Mark-Hugo J. Maathuis Netherlands
J.K. Kievit Netherlands
Janneke Wiersema‐Buist Netherlands
Arthur L. Humphries United States
A. P. Gonzalez Germany
Arnaud Deroover Belgium
Vassilios S. Avlonitis United Kingdom
Ali Ramouz Germany
L Janoušek Czechia
T. Chapelle Belgium
M.H. Booster relative to Mark-Hugo J. Maathuis Netherlands Mark-Hugo J. Maathuis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark-Hugo J. Maathuis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Booster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Booster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Booster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Booster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Booster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Booster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Booster. The network helps show where M.H. Booster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.H. Booster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.H. Booster Line = papers co-authored together M.H. Booster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995246
2 200293
3 199070
4 200161
5 199346
6 200042
7 199437
8 199935
9 200232
10 199929
11 199125
12 200325
13
In situ perfusion of kidneys from non-heart-beating donors: the Maastricht protocol.
199323
14 200120
15 199415
16
Beneficial effect of machine perfusion on the preservation of renal microcirculatory integrity in ischemically damaged kidneys.
199315
17 199314
18 200113
19 200111
20 200110

About M.H. Booster

M.H. Booster is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transplantation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 951 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (27 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (15 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (15 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (5 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (5 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (3 papers) and Acute Kidney Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (251 citations), Hepatology (160 citations), Surgery (709 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (354 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (22 citations). M.H. Booster has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Bart M. Stubenitsky, G. Kootstra, René Wijnen, Lauren Brasile, Carl E. Haisch, E. Heineman, J. de Boer, G Kootstra, E.J.C. van Rijssel and J. Baptist Trimbos. Their work appears in journals such as Transplant International, Transplantation, American Journal of Transplantation, Renal Failure and Laboratory Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact