Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

3.1k papers and 38.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 38.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (2.0k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.3k papers) and Molecular Biology (495 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1.0k papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (772 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (498 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology are Manabu Mochizuki, Mitsuru Sawa, Makoto Araie, Kensaku Miyake, Tetsuro Oshika, Hiroshi Gotô, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Kenji Inoue, Mitsuko Yuzawa and Toshihiko Matsuo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025