Mette Bagger
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Papers in
-
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 18
- Oncology 12
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 10
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 2
- Co-authors
- Jens Folke Kiilgaard (17 shared papers)Kent Sahlin (2 shared papers)Maria Fernström (2 shared papers)Per Kent Pedersen (2 shared papers)Martin Mogensen (2 shared papers)Steffen Heegaard (10 shared papers)Klaus Kaae Andersen (4 shared papers)Karin Wadt (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (6 papers)Ophthalmology (5 papers)Cancers (3 papers)Acta Ophthalmologica (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
Mette Bagger
17 papers receiving 638 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Ophthalmology 403
- Complementary and alternative medicine 108
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 73
- Cell Biology 117
- Oncology 185
Countries citing papers authored by Mette Bagger
This map shows the geographic impact of Mette Bagger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mette Bagger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mette Bagger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mette Bagger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mette Bagger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mette Bagger. The network helps show where Mette Bagger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mette Bagger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 148 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 139 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Mette Bagger
Mette Bagger is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Oncology and Treatments (18 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (10 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (403 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (108 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (73 citations), Cell Biology (117 citations) and Oncology (185 citations). Mette Bagger has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Kent Sahlin, Maria Fernström, Per Kent Pedersen, Martin Mogensen, Steffen Heegaard, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Karin Wadt, Richard Yu and A. Hunter Shain. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmology, Cancers, Acta Ophthalmologica and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.