Mark Alberti

429 citations
23 papers · 256 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Alberti

19 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Mark Alberti
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Ophthalmology 212
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 184
  • Neurology 39
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 8
Replace Chun-Hsiu Liu with:
Chun-Hsiu Liu Taiwan
Beatriz Vidal‐Villegas Spain
Henry Shen-Lih Chen Taiwan
Seray Aslan Bayhan Türkiye
Jun Hosohata Japan
João Beato Portugal
Jinho Jeong South Korea
Jaemoon Ahn South Korea
Marc Töteberg‐Harms Switzerland
Hurramhon Shokirova Japan
Mark Alberti relative to Chun-Hsiu Liu Taiwan Chun-Hsiu Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chun-Hsiu Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Alberti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Alberti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Alberti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Alberti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Alberti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Alberti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Alberti. The network helps show where Mark Alberti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Alberti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Alberti Line = papers co-authored together Mark Alberti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202048
2 201638
3 201429
4 201925
5 201924
6 202218
7 201912
8 202211
9 201710
10 20209
11 20169
12 20198
13
[Complications of disposable extended-wear contact lenses. Apropos of 6 cases].
19924
14 20213
15 20233
16 20212
17 20181
18 20231
19 20241
20
Progression of full-thickness macular holes prior to surgery
20190

About Mark Alberti

Mark Alberti is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (11 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (10 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (212 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (184 citations), Neurology (39 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (8 citations). Mark Alberti has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Morten la Cour, Birgitte Nielsen, Søren Solborg Bjerrum, Lars Konge, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Ivan Potapenko, Miriam Kolko, Yoon Soo Park, Jan O. Pralits and Daniella Bach‐Holm. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Retina, Ophthalmology Retina, Translational Vision Science & Technology and Journal of Biomechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact