Meredith Thomas

680 citations
13 papers · 538 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Meredith Thomas

13 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Meredith Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 189
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 133
  • Molecular Biology 267
  • Ophthalmology 30
  • Plant Science 112
Replace Michael Mende with:
Michael Mende United Kingdom
Suo Qiu China
Phillippa Cottrill United Kingdom
Jennifer Dugas‐Ford United States
Taro Tsujimura Japan
Evgeny Z. Kvon United States
Jay P. Uhler Sweden
Daniel Vasiliauskas United States
Take Matsuyama Japan
Kazuko Fujitani Japan
Meredith Thomas relative to Michael Mende United Kingdom Michael Mende's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Michael Mende · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Thomas. The network helps show where Meredith Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1999107
2 200699
3 200960
4 200158
5 201049
6 200544
7 201143
8 201141
9 200921
10 20218
11 20036
12
Going for gold
20051
13
Smoking and its effects on postpartum depression.
20171

About Meredith Thomas

Meredith Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (189 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (133 citations), Molecular Biology (267 citations), Ophthalmology (30 citations) and Plant Science (112 citations). Meredith Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Trevor D. Lamb, Paula J. Rudall, Beverley J. Glover, Richard M. Bateman, Christoph Friedburg, Dion S. Devey, E. J. Bradshaw, Vincent Savolainen, Allan G. Ellis and Nancy C. Garwood. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, BMC Genetics and American Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact