Meredith Thomas

672 citations
13 papers · 514 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Meredith Thomas

13 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Meredith Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 196
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
  • Ophthalmology 42
  • Molecular Biology 284
  • Plant Science 117
Replace Kyle J. McCulloch with:
Kyle J. McCulloch United States
Phillippa Cottrill United Kingdom
Suo Qiu China
Taro Tsujimura Japan
Jennifer Dugas‐Ford United States
Robert Tompkins United States
Judith D. Speck United States
Jay P. Uhler Sweden
Richard Binggeli United States
Evgeny Z. Kvon United States
Meredith Thomas relative to Kyle J. McCulloch United States Kyle J. McCulloch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Kyle J. McCulloch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Thomas. The network helps show where Meredith Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1999103
2 200694
3 200158
4 200957
5 201046
6 200542
7 201141
8 201138
9 200920
10 20218
11 20035
12
Going for gold
20051
13
Smoking and its effects on postpartum depression.
20171

About Meredith Thomas

Meredith Thomas is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (196 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations), Ophthalmology (42 citations), Molecular Biology (284 citations) and Plant Science (117 citations). Meredith Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Trevor D. Lamb, Beverley J. Glover, Paula J. Rudall, Richard M. Bateman, Christoph Friedburg, E. J. Bradshaw, Dion S. Devey, Vincent Savolainen, Allan G. Ellis and Nancy C. Garwood. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Injury, BMC Genetics and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact