Meredith Gresham

14 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

Meredith Gresham
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 343
  • General Health Professions 330
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
  • Clinical Psychology 127
  • Sociology and Political Science 173
Replace Kei Kudo with:
Kei Kudo Japan
Debra Cherry United States
Frøydis Bruvik Norway
L. D. Van Mierlo Netherlands
Ian James United Kingdom
Warwick Black Australia
Jacqueline van der Lee Netherlands
Áine Ní Mhaoláin Ireland
Gunilla Nordberg Sweden
Wayne Caron United States
Meredith Gresham relative to Kei Kudo Japan Kei Kudo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Kei Kudo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Gresham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Gresham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Gresham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Gresham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Gresham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Gresham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Gresham. The network helps show where Meredith Gresham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Gresham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Gresham Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Gresham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1989207
2 1997167
3 201940
4 201634
5 199226
6 201821
7 20187
8 19977
9 20146
10 20203
11 20232
12 19782
13
Carers of people with dementia: respite use and non-use
20121
14
Building better respite: hearing the voices of carers
20121
15
Respite care in dementia: consumer perspectives
20121

About Meredith Gresham

Meredith Gresham is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health Information Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (343 citations), General Health Professions (330 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (127 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (173 citations). Meredith Gresham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry Brodaty, Georgina Luscombe, Maria Crotty, Suzanne M Dyer, Maayken E. L. van den Berg, Megan Winsall, Megan Heffernan, Ian D. Cameron, Megan Corlis and Liz Gill. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, SpringerPlus, Australasian Journal on Ageing, BMC Health Services Research and Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact