Meredith E. Erwin

47 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

Meredith E. Erwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Molecular Medicine 244
  • Clinical Biochemistry 127
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 42
  • Pharmacology 226
  • Infectious Diseases 252
Replace Carmen Betriú with:
Carmen Betriú Spain
Steven A. Marshall United States
Lois M. Ednie United States
Meridith E. Erwin United States
Sharon A. Crawford United States
Mark W. Garrison United States
M R Jacobs United States
M. Leticia McElmeel United States
P. Y. Chau Hong Kong
Iciar Rodríguez-Avial Spain
Meredith E. Erwin relative to Carmen Betriú Spain Carmen Betriú's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carmen Betriú · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith E. Erwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith E. Erwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith E. Erwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith E. Erwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith E. Erwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith E. Erwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith E. Erwin. The network helps show where Meredith E. Erwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith E. Erwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith E. Erwin Line = papers co-authored together Meredith E. Erwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996176
2 1996121
3 199696
4 199763
5 199945
6 199342
7 199238
8 199231
9 199926
10 200025
11 199320
12 199920
13 199219
14 199918
15 199117
16 199415
17 199214
18 199214
19 199913
20 199913

About Meredith E. Erwin

Meredith E. Erwin is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, Pharmacology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 47 papers that have together received 996 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (27 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (26 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (5 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Legionella and Acanthamoeba research (3 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (244 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (127 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (42 citations), Pharmacology (226 citations) and Infectious Diseases (252 citations). Meredith E. Erwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Ronald N. Jones, David Michael Johnson, M S Barrett, Michael A. Pfaller, Douglas J. Biedenbach, Ana Espinel‐Ingroff, Richard R. Facklam, David S. Stephens, Wendy S. Baughman and Anne Schuchat. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and Journal of Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact