Meredith Broderick

543 citations
40 papers · 341 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Meredith Broderick

33 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Meredith Broderick
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 137
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 192
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 27
  • Neurology 55
  • Genetics 29
Replace Satoshi Toyama with:
Satoshi Toyama Japan
Vito Antonio Falcone Italy
Candela Caballero‐Eraso Spain
Ertuğrul Bolayır Türkiye
Hsiu‐Wen Tsai United States
Lanyue Hu China
Åsa Rembratt Denmark
Caroline McHutchison United Kingdom
Shi Qi Li China
Meredith Broderick relative to Satoshi Toyama Japan Satoshi Toyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Satoshi Toyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Broderick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Broderick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Broderick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Broderick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Broderick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Broderick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Broderick. The network helps show where Meredith Broderick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Broderick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Broderick Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Broderick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201070
2 201158
3 201647
4 202222
5 200821
6 202119
7 202214
8 20229
9 20209
10 20228
11 20188
12 20206
13 20215
14 20115
15 20235
16 20215
17 20214
18 20233
19 20233
20 20203

About Meredith Broderick

Meredith Broderick is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Genetics, Economics and Econometrics and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (28 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (12 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (10 papers), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (6 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (137 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (192 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (27 citations), Neurology (55 citations) and Genetics (29 citations). Meredith Broderick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Guilleminault, Steven Waggoner, Andrew C. Nelsen, Vivian E. von Gruenigen, Heidi E. Frasure, Samith Sandadi, Shannon Sullivan, Oscar Carrillo, Éric Frénette and R. James White. Their work appears in journals such as Pulmonary Circulation, Respiratory Medicine, CHEST Journal, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact