Meng Dong

63 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Meng Dong
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Reproductive Medicine 109
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 94
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 45
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 87
  • Automotive Engineering 56
Replace Jinhong Li with:
Jinhong Li China
George Paul Australia
Yuanyuan Liu China
Yu Gao China
Bowen Liu China
Jordán United States
Akira Sato Japan
Nan Li China
Matthew Robinson United Kingdom
Meng Dong relative to Jinhong Li China Jinhong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jinhong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meng Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meng Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meng Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meng Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meng Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meng Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meng Dong. The network helps show where Meng Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meng Dong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meng Dong Line = papers co-authored together Meng Dong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201672
2 201955
3 202447
4 201046
5 200944
6 201931
7 198930
8 202227
9 202127
10 201723
11 201522
12 202020
13 202020
14 202519
15 202019
16 202015
17 201814
18 202213
19 201913
20 202112

About Meng Dong

Meng Dong is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Reproductive Medicine, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Applications (12 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (9 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (7 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (6 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (109 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (94 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (45 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (87 citations) and Automotive Engineering (56 citations). Meng Dong has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tie Liu, Yingchun Wang, Jichun Tan, Qiang Wang, Huaguang Zhang, Jiahui Qiu, Huaguang Zhang, Nian X. Sun, Shulin Dong and Pingping Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, AIP Advances, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact