Melvyn Stokes

16 papers receiving 133 citations

Peers

Melvyn Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 50
  • Economics and Econometrics 128
  • Marketing 42
  • History 43
  • Music 11
Replace David M. Henkin with:
David M. Henkin United States
Ruth Vasey Australia
Jennifer M. Bean United States
Don H. Doyle United States
Steve Rappaport United States
John McMurria United States
Gerald Newman United States
David L. Chappell United States
Kenneth McNaught Canada
Donald E. Ginter United States
Melvyn Stokes relative to David M. Henkin United States David M. Henkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David M. Henkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melvyn Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melvyn Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melvyn Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melvyn Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melvyn Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melvyn Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melvyn Stokes. The network helps show where Melvyn Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Melvyn Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melvyn Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Melvyn Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Going to the Movies: Hollywood and the Social Experience of Cinema
200765
2
Hollywood Abroad: Audiences and Cultural Exchange
200758
3 199646
4 199941
5
The United States and the European Alliance since 1945
199913
6
The state of U.S. history
20026
7 19955
8 20085
9 19834
10
American History through Hollywood Film: From the Revolution to the 1960s
20134
11 19973
12
"Intellectual History, Democracy, and the Culture of Irony"
20023
13 19963
14 20172
15 20112
16 20181
17 20101
18 20011
19 20020
20 20220

About Melvyn Stokes

Melvyn Stokes is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History and Anthropology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (12 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers) and European history and politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (50 citations), Economics and Econometrics (128 citations), Marketing (42 citations), History (43 citations) and Music (11 citations). Melvyn Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Richard Maltby, Robert C. Allen, Stephen Conway, Robert Cook, Kathleen Burk, Rick Halpern, James T. Kloppenberg, Ronald G. Walters and Matthew Jones. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, Cinema Journal, The Economic History Review, European Journal of American Studies and Memory Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact