Melanie Murphy

45 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Melanie Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Ophthalmology 44
  • Biophysics 29
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 76
  • Epidemiology 119
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 49
Replace Michael-John Dolan with:
Michael-John Dolan United States
John J. Ely United States
Dóra Júlia Szabó Hungary
J.‐M. Aran France
Yoshifumi Ikeda Japan
Jennifer S. Herstein United States
Jacqueline C. Tanaka United States
Wolf M. Harmening Germany
James M. Miller United States
Melanie Murphy relative to Michael-John Dolan United States Michael-John Dolan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.2×
Michael-John Dolan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Murphy. The network helps show where Melanie Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199886
2 200268
3 200258
4 202139
5 200638
6 200829
7 201829
8 201828
9 200727
10 200321
11 202119
12 202319
13
The retina/RPE proteome in chick myopia and hyperopia models: Commonalities with inherited and age-related ocular pathologies.
201717
14 202312
15 202112
16 20189
17 20229
18 20238
19 20217
20 20137

About Melanie Murphy

Melanie Murphy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Epidemiology and Ophthalmology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 613 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (44 citations), Biophysics (29 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations), Epidemiology (119 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (49 citations). Melanie Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sheila G. Crewther, D.J. Squirrell, David P. Crewther, Ayla Barutchu, Philip John White, Edith L. Bavin, Christopher Robin Lowe, Laurence C. Tisi, James Murray and Andrew J. Shields. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Life, Analytica Chimica Acta and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact