Melanie Lean
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 6
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 2
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 1
- Co-authors
- Helen Killaspy (6 shared papers)Louise Marston (5 shared papers)Miriam Fornells‐Ambrojo (1 shared paper)Alyssa Milton (1 shared paper)Tim Kendall (1 shared paper)Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans (1 shared paper)Sonia Johnson (1 shared paper)Amina Yesufu-Udechuku (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Early Intervention in Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Melanie Lean
12 papers receiving 384 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
- Clinical Psychology 115
- General Health Professions 125
- Applied Psychology 18
- Occupational Therapy 9
Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Lean
This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Lean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Lean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Lean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Lean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Lean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Lean. The network helps show where Melanie Lean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Lean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 |
About Melanie Lean
Melanie Lean is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Oncology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations), Clinical Psychology (115 citations), General Health Professions (125 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Occupational Therapy (9 citations). Melanie Lean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Killaspy, Louise Marston, Miriam Fornells‐Ambrojo, Alyssa Milton, Tim Kendall, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, Sonia Johnson, Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, Frank Holloway and Tom Craig. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Early Intervention in Psychiatry and The Lancet Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.