Melanie Lean
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 5
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 2
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 7
- Co-authors
- Helen Killaspy (6 shared papers)Louise Marston (5 shared papers)Tim Kendall (1 shared paper)Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans (1 shared paper)Nicholas Green (5 shared papers)Frank Holloway (5 shared papers)Amina Yesufu-Udechuku (1 shared paper)Alyssa Milton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Early Intervention in Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Melanie Lean
11 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 166
- Psychiatry and Mental health 118
- General Health Professions 180
- Applied Psychology 23
- Social Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Lean
This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Lean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Lean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Lean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Lean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Lean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Lean. The network helps show where Melanie Lean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Lean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 0 |
About Melanie Lean
Melanie Lean is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (166 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (118 citations), General Health Professions (180 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations) and Social Psychology (87 citations). Melanie Lean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Helen Killaspy, Louise Marston, Tim Kendall, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, Nicholas Green, Frank Holloway, Amina Yesufu-Udechuku, Alyssa Milton, Sonia Johnson and Tom Craig. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Early Intervention in Psychiatry and The Lancet Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.