Meiting Jiang

457 citations
28 papers · 341 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Meiting Jiang

28 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Meiting Jiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 123
  • Pharmacology 66
  • Analytical Chemistry 71
  • Spectroscopy 68
  • Molecular Biology 264
Replace Hong-da Wang with:
Hong-da Wang China
Zijin Feng China
Xu Liang China
Lixing Nie China
Yuexin Qian China
Zhenzuo Jiang China
Guifang Feng China
Yajuan Xu China
Juan Da China
Meiting Jiang relative to Hong-da Wang China Hong-da Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hong-da Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meiting Jiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meiting Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meiting Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meiting Jiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meiting Jiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meiting Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meiting Jiang. The network helps show where Meiting Jiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meiting Jiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meiting Jiang Line = papers co-authored together Meiting Jiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202231
2 202330
3 202322
4 202220
5 202318
6 202217
7 202315
8 202315
9 202215
10 202315
11 202313
12 202312
13 202411
14 202311
15 202211
16 202211
17 20229
18 20249
19 20239
20 20228

About Meiting Jiang

Meiting Jiang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (18 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (16 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (14 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (6 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (5 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (2 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (123 citations), Pharmacology (66 citations), Analytical Chemistry (71 citations), Spectroscopy (68 citations) and Molecular Biology (264 citations). Meiting Jiang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Macao and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Wenzhi Yang, Xiaoyan Xu, Boxue Chen, Xiumei Gao, Hongda Wang, Meiyu Liu, Xiaohang Li, Zheng Li, Huimin Wang and Ying Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Molecules and TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact