Megan E. Shott

42 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Megan E. Shott
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 188
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 341
  • Applied Psychology 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 208
Replace Maria Seidel with:
Maria Seidel Germany
Laura A. Berner United States
Franziska Ritschel Germany
Joe J. Simon Germany
Nicolette Siep Netherlands
Claire McConaha United States
Sonja T.P. Spoor United States
Oren Contreras‐Rodríguez Spain
James May United States
Dana Smith United Kingdom
Megan E. Shott relative to Maria Seidel Germany Maria Seidel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Maria Seidel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan E. Shott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan E. Shott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan E. Shott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan E. Shott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan E. Shott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan E. Shott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan E. Shott. The network helps show where Megan E. Shott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan E. Shott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan E. Shott Line = papers co-authored together Megan E. Shott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012235
2 2013185
3 2014110
4 201197
5 201195
6 201094
7 201689
8 201488
9 201979
10 201378
11 201878
12 201175
13 201775
14 201269
15 201556
16 201751
17 202149
18 201848
19 201947
20 201645

About Megan E. Shott

Megan E. Shott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (35 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (188 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (341 citations), Applied Psychology (80 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations). Megan E. Shott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Guido Frank, Tamara Pryor, Jennifer Hagman, Tony T. Yang, Marisa C. DeGuzman, Leah M. Jappe, Randall C. O’Reilly, Jason R. Tregellas, Vijay A. Mittal and Jeremy R. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Neuropsychopharmacology, Translational Psychiatry, Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact