Megan E. Shott

42 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Megan E. Shott
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Clinical Psychology 1.5k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 230
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 476
  • Sensory Systems 106
  • Applied Psychology 111
Replace Maria Seidel with:
Maria Seidel Germany
Claire McConaha United States
Joe J. Simon Germany
Nils B. Kroemer Germany
Ashley D. Young United States
Franziska Ritschel Germany
Oren Contreras‐Rodríguez Spain
Laura A. Berner United States
Jason A. Avery United States
Jochen Seitz Germany
Megan E. Shott relative to Maria Seidel Germany Maria Seidel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Maria Seidel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan E. Shott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan E. Shott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan E. Shott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan E. Shott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan E. Shott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan E. Shott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan E. Shott. The network helps show where Megan E. Shott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan E. Shott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan E. Shott Line = papers co-authored together Megan E. Shott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012201
2 2013180
3 2014103
4 201193
5 201092
6 201189
7 201486
8 201683
9 201977
10 201373
11 201873
12 201171
13 201769
14 201265
15 201555
16 201848
17 201945
18 202144
19 201744
20 201643

About Megan E. Shott

Megan E. Shott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (37 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (23 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (230 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (476 citations), Sensory Systems (106 citations) and Applied Psychology (111 citations). Megan E. Shott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Guido Frank, Tamara Pryor, Jennifer Hagman, Tony T. Yang, Marisa C. DeGuzman, Leah M. Jappe, Jason R. Tregellas, Randall C. O’Reilly, Vijay A. Mittal and Jeremy R. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, Neuropsychopharmacology, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Biological Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact