Meaghan Tenney

1.3k citations
28 papers · 587 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Meaghan Tenney

27 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers

Meaghan Tenney
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 197
  • Reproductive Medicine 107
  • Epidemiology 154
  • Internal Medicine 15
  • Oncology 94
Replace R. Kürzl with:
R. Kürzl Germany
Geneviève Bouchard‐Fortier Canada
Chiara Borghi Italy
Taek Sang Lee South Korea
Tomomi Egawa‐Takata Japan
Jenny M. Whitworth United States
Vance Broach United States
Cheng-I Liao Taiwan
Jason A. Lachance United States
Jason Yap United Kingdom
Meaghan Tenney relative to R. Kürzl Germany R. Kürzl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
R. Kürzl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meaghan Tenney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meaghan Tenney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meaghan Tenney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meaghan Tenney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meaghan Tenney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meaghan Tenney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meaghan Tenney. The network helps show where Meaghan Tenney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meaghan Tenney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meaghan Tenney Line = papers co-authored together Meaghan Tenney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014158
2 201673
3 201147
4 201540
5 201638
6 201534
7 201530
8 201523
9 201619
10 201719
11
Studies of the relationship between sympathoadrenal function, acid base derangements and ventricular contractile force.
196018
12 202316
13 201614
14 201511
15 20149
16 20159
17 20126
18 20166
19 20183
20 20103

About Meaghan Tenney

Meaghan Tenney is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (197 citations), Reproductive Medicine (107 citations), Epidemiology (154 citations), Internal Medicine (15 citations) and Oncology (94 citations). Meaghan Tenney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Joan L. Walker, Erin Bishop, Cara Mathews, Katherine Moxley, Kathleen N. Moore, Elizabeth Nugent, Nita K. Lee, S. Diane Yamada, Mark Schiffman and Rosemary E. Zuna. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact