M.B. Gush

1.4k citations
57 papers · 895 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

M.B. Gush

54 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

M.B. Gush
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Global and Planetary Change 480
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 230
  • Soil Science 177
  • Forestry 61
  • Water Science and Technology 199
Replace Oliver van Straaten with:
Oliver van Straaten Germany
Ricardo Mata‐González United States
G. C. S. Negi India
Xueyong Zhao China
Lucian Dincă Romania
João de Athaydes Silva Brazil
Andrew H. Grigg Australia
Jean-Marc Salmon United States
Feng Jiao China
Shikui Dong China
M.B. Gush relative to Oliver van Straaten Germany Oliver van Straaten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Oliver van Straaten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.B. Gush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.B. Gush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.B. Gush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.B. Gush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.B. Gush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.B. Gush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.B. Gush. The network helps show where M.B. Gush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.B. Gush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.B. Gush Line = papers co-authored together M.B. Gush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012103
2 201685
3 201576
4 201254
5 201850
6 200246
7 201544
8 202040
9 201434
10 201429
11 202027
12 201326
13 201924
14 201124
15 202018
16 201117
17 200915
18 201814
19 202214
20
Water-use in relation to biomass of indigenous tree species in woodland, forest and/or plantation conditions
200912

About M.B. Gush

M.B. Gush is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Ecology, Water Science and Technology and Soil Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 895 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (26 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (11 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (7 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (7 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (480 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (230 citations), Soil Science (177 citations), Forestry (61 citations) and Water Science and Technology (199 citations). M.B. Gush has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sebinasi Dzikiti, David C. Le Maître, Colin S. Everson, Klaudia Schachtschneider, Vivek Naiken, Greg G. Forsyth, M. G. Mengistu, André Görgens, Moses Azong Cho and A Maherry. Their work appears in journals such as Water SA, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Arid Environments, Agricultural Water Management and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact