Maya Jane Bates

1.3k citations
98 papers · 520 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Maya Jane Bates

72 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Maya Jane Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Equine 16
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Hepatology 29
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 100
  • Reproductive Medicine 17
Replace Akila Subramaniam with:
Akila Subramaniam United States
Michelle O’Neill Ireland
David A. Wiseman Canada
Jyotindu Debnath India
KIMBERLY D. BUTT Canada
Meileen Acosta United States
Adrienne Cheung Canada
Maeve Eogan Ireland
Kevin Zarca France
Tracy Truong United States
Maya Jane Bates relative to Akila Subramaniam United States Akila Subramaniam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Akila Subramaniam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maya Jane Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maya Jane Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maya Jane Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maya Jane Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maya Jane Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maya Jane Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maya Jane Bates. The network helps show where Maya Jane Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maya Jane Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maya Jane Bates Line = papers co-authored together Maya Jane Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200251
2 201137
3 199636
4 201133
5
Abdominal ultrasound : how, why and when
199931
6 201730
7 201828
8 201227
9 201524
10 202124
11 200922
12 201819
13 201912
14 198110
15 20159
16 20119
17 19828
18 20238
19 20128
20 20097

About Maya Jane Bates

Maya Jane Bates is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, General Health Professions and Equine, having authored 98 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (16 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Hepatology (29 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (100 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (17 citations). Maya Jane Bates has collaborated with scholars based in Malawi, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynne Rogerson, Louis Wilhelmus Niessen, Sean Duffy, William James Harrison, S. Bertel Squire, Nyengo C. Mkandawire, E.E. Noiles, Nicola Desmond, Leo Peter Lockie Masamba and Dermot Gorman. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Standard, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Wellcome Open Research and BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact