E.E. Noiles
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Physiology top 2%
- Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 13
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 13
- Ovarian function and disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Bayard T. Storey (4 shared papers)John K. Critser (5 shared papers)P. Mazur (5 shared papers)Dayong Gao (2 shared papers)Juan G. Álvarez (1 shared paper)P.F. Watson (4 shared papers)F.W. Kleinhans (3 shared papers)Janice L. Bailey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Theriogenology (5 papers)Cryobiology (5 papers)Fertility and Sterility (1 paper)Animal Reproduction Science (1 paper)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
E.E. Noiles
18 papers receiving 677 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Reproductive Medicine 570
- Physiology 140
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 512
- Equine 28
- Agronomy and Crop Science 69
Countries citing papers authored by E.E. Noiles
This map shows the geographic impact of E.E. Noiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.E. Noiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.E. Noiles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.E. Noiles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.E. Noiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.E. Noiles. The network helps show where E.E. Noiles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside E.E. Noiles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 153 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 122 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 118 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 69 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 42 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 41 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 17 | Response of spermatozoa to hyposmotic stress reflects cryopreservation success | 1992 | 2 |
| 18 | 1982 | 1 |
About E.E. Noiles
E.E. Noiles is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Equine and Small Animals, having authored 18 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (13 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (13 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (570 citations), Physiology (140 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (512 citations), Equine (28 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (69 citations). E.E. Noiles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bayard T. Storey, John K. Critser, P. Mazur, Dayong Gao, Juan G. Álvarez, P.F. Watson, F.W. Kleinhans, Janice L. Bailey, Katharine M. Pelican and Budhan S. Pukazhenthi. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Cryobiology, Fertility and Sterility, Animal Reproduction Science and Journal of Animal Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.