Max Wertheimer

5.7k citations
8 papers · 246 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Psychological Review (1 paper)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks (1 paper)The MIT Press eBooks (1 paper)CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)
Partner nations
GermanyUnited States

In The Last Decade

Max Wertheimer

7 papers receiving 220 citations

Peers

Max Wertheimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 119
  • General Psychology 5
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 66
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 34
Replace Erich Goldmeier with:
Erich Goldmeier United States
Marty J. Schmidt United States
Tony Whetstone United States
Mark Wagner United States
George Weaver United States
Eric G. Freedman United States
Marc A. Sullivan United States
Michael S. Ambinder United States
Bonnie Lynn Nash-Webber United States
Al Ahumada United States
Max Wertheimer relative to Erich Goldmeier United States Erich Goldmeier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Erich Goldmeier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Wertheimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Wertheimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Wertheimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Wertheimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Wertheimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Wertheimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Wertheimer. The network helps show where Max Wertheimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Max Wertheimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Wertheimer Line = papers co-authored together Max Wertheimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Principles of perceptual organization
1958173
2 201234
3 195916
4 201711
5 20208
6 19612
7
Wertheimer's seminars revisited : problems in perception
19721
8 19911

About Max Wertheimer

Max Wertheimer is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cultural Studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Aesthetics, and Perception (2 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (1 paper), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (1 paper) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (119 citations), General Psychology (5 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (66 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (34 citations). Max Wertheimer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Abraham S. Luchins and Edith H. Luchins. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks, The MIT Press eBooks and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact