Mark Wagner
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 5
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 1
-
- Color perception and design 3
- Co-authors
- John C. Baird (4 shared papers)William J. Barbaresi (1 shared paper)Charles J. Long (1 shared paper)Gary Hatfield (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2 papers)Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives (1 paper)The Clinical Neuropsychologist (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (1 paper)Journal of Environmental Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Wagner
10 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 324
- Automotive Engineering 80
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
- General Psychology 7
- Social Psychology 81
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wagner
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wagner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wagner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wagner. The network helps show where Mark Wagner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mark Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 290 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 3 | 1981 | 21 | |
| 4 | The utility of the Thurstone Word Fluency Test in identifying cortical damage. | 1983 | 15 |
| 5 | 1981 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 0 |
About Mark Wagner
Mark Wagner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Automotive Engineering, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers), Color Science and Applications (2 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Geographic Information Systems Studies (1 paper) and Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (324 citations), Automotive Engineering (80 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), General Psychology (7 citations) and Social Psychology (81 citations). Mark Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John C. Baird, William J. Barbaresi, Charles J. Long and Gary Hatfield. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Journal of Environmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.