George Weaver

547 citations
57 papers · 423 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

George Weaver

52 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

George Weaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 181
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 122
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 57
  • General Psychology 4
Replace Jo Law with:
Jo Law Australia
Luc Rodet France
Maithilee Kunda United States
Erich Goldmeier United States
Michael R. Houck United States
Clément Moulin-Frier France
Sandor Wiseman Canada
David Isenberg United States
A. J. Campbell Canada
Michael S. Ambinder United States
George Weaver relative to Jo Law Australia Jo Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Jo Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Weaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Weaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Weaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Weaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Weaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Weaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Weaver. The network helps show where George Weaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside George Weaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Weaver Line = papers co-authored together George Weaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200471
2 197449
3 197839
4 196523
5 197323
6 196522
7 199321
8 199614
9 197112
10 197410
11 196910
12 196910
13 20039
14 19737
15 19687
16 19516
17 19805
18 19745
19 19864
20 20034

About George Weaver

George Weaver is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Geometry and Topology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (20 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (18 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (8 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (6 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (122 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (57 citations) and General Psychology (4 citations). George Weaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Claudia J. Stanny, Rudolph W. Schulz, Peter F. Delaney, Rajan Mahadevan, K. Anders Ericsson, Darryl Bruce, Hugues Leblanc, Jay R. Kostman, John Corcoran and Melinda C. R. Burgess. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Studia Logica, The Journal of General Psychology, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and History and Philosophy of Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact