Max Watson

55 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Max Watson
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 81
  • Internal Medicine 46
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 247
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
  • General Health Professions 125
Replace Geoffrey C. Lamb with:
Geoffrey C. Lamb United States
Helen Skerman Australia
Anne Hutchinson United Kingdom
Gabriella Marx Germany
Karen McCabe United Kingdom
Yevgeniya Gokun United States
Donna Jo McCloskey United States
Cheryl Craigs United Kingdom
Sachin J. Shah United States
Ruth McConigley Australia
Max Watson relative to Geoffrey C. Lamb United States Geoffrey C. Lamb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.1×
Geoffrey C. Lamb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Watson. The network helps show where Max Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Watson Line = papers co-authored together Max Watson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201876
2 201755
3 201950
4 201644
5 201543
6 200940
7 200639
8 201539
9 201526
10
Project ECHO: an effective means of increasing palliative care capacity.
201725
11 201824
12 201920
13 201319
14 201715
15 201614
16 201813
17 201613
18 200810
19 202110
20 20129

About Max Watson

Max Watson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 689 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (18 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (81 citations), Internal Medicine (46 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (247 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations) and General Health Professions (125 citations). Max Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Brazil, Sonja McIlfatrick, Carole Parsons, Hilary Buchanan, Peter Passmore, Clare White, Caroline Lucas, Lynn Dunwoody, Andrew J. Hoy and Karen Galway. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Palliative Medicine, BMC Palliative Care, BMC Health Services Research and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact