Max Schaldach

474 citations
43 papers · 367 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Max Schaldach

29 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Max Schaldach
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 141
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 59
  • Surgery 116
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 4
  • Biomedical Engineering 84
Replace A. G. Moore with:
A. G. Moore United States
PETER P. TARJAN United States
Wolf W. von Maltzahn United States
Matthew D. Bonner United States
Dariusz Janusek Poland
JOERG OTTO SCHWAB Germany
R. W. Gülch Germany
Qian Lei China
Brian J. Wenzel United States
Bryan Parker United States
Max Schaldach relative to A. G. Moore United States A. G. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. G. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Schaldach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Schaldach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Schaldach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Schaldach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Schaldach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Schaldach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Schaldach. The network helps show where Max Schaldach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Schaldach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Schaldach Line = papers co-authored together Max Schaldach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975123
2 199039
3 199234
4 199820
5 199020
6 197218
7 199816
8 199810
9 199010
10 20009
11 19978
12 19987
13 19946
14 19906
15 19924
16 19983
17 19923
18 19923
19 19982
20 20002

About Max Schaldach

Max Schaldach is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Automotive Engineering, having authored 43 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (7 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (141 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (59 citations), Surgery (116 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (4 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (84 citations). Max Schaldach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Seymour Furman, Max Hubmann, Roland Hardt, A. Bolz, Werner Porstmann, Harry Warnke, G. Fröhlig, Hermann J. Schieffer, HOLGER SCHWERDT and Günter Schreier. Their work appears in journals such as Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, The American Journal of Cardiology, Biosensors and Bioelectronics and Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact