Max Nänny
Impact in
-
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
-
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Papers in
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 6
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 3
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 2
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism 1
- History 4
- American Literature and Culture 3
- Cultural History and Identity Formation 1
- Co-authors
- Olga Fischer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- English Studies (3 papers)Word & Image (2 papers)European Journal of English Studies (2 papers)ELH (1 paper)The Hemingway review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Switzerland
In The Last Decade
Max Nänny
6 papers receiving 24 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Literature and Literary Theory 14
- Language and Linguistics 12
- Linguistics and Language 5
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 13
- Cultural Studies 4
Countries citing papers authored by Max Nänny
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Nänny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Nänny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Nänny more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max Nänny
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Nänny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Nänny. The network helps show where Max Nänny may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Max Nänny, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Motivated Sign. Iconicity in Language and Literature 2 | 2000 | 16 |
| 2 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 3 | Hemingway’s Architecture of Prose: Chiastic Patterns and Their Narrative Functions | 1997 | 4 |
| 4 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 6 | Die ikonische Verwendung des Chiasmus in der Literatur | 2002 | 1 |
| 7 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 11 | Hemingway’s Use of Chiastic Centering as an Interpretative Clue | 1998 | 0 |
| 12 | The Use of Natural Objects as Symbols in Hemingway's "Up in Michigan" | 2001 | 0 |
| 13 | 1962 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 0 |
About Max Nänny
Max Nänny is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Language and Linguistics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 38 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers), American Literature and Culture (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (1 paper) and Cultural History and Identity Formation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (14 citations), Language and Linguistics (12 citations), Linguistics and Language (5 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (13 citations) and Cultural Studies (4 citations). Max Nänny has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Olga Fischer. Their work appears in journals such as English Studies, Word & Image, European Journal of English Studies, ELH and The Hemingway review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.