Boethius
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Philosophy top 10%
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Papers in
- Classics 7
- Medieval Literature and History 7
-
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
- Co-authors
- H. F. Stewart (2 shared papers)Edward Kennard Rand (2 shared papers)James J. O’Donnell (1 shared paper)S. J. Tester (1 shared paper)Eleonore Stump (2 shared papers)Griffiths (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) (1 paper)Cornell University Press eBooks (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Boethius
6 papers receiving 38 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Classics 22
- Philosophy 21
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- Religious studies 8
- History 16
Countries citing papers authored by Boethius
This map shows the geographic impact of Boethius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boethius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boethius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Boethius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boethius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boethius. The network helps show where Boethius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Boethius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 29 | |
| 2 | 1973 | 23 | |
| 3 | King Alfred's Old English Version of Boethius de Consolatione Philosophiae | 2009 | 16 |
| 4 | New Directions in Boethian Studies | 2007 | 1 |
| 5 | Boethius: The Theological Tractates | 2017 | 1 |
| 6 | Chaucer's Translation of Boethius's "De Consolatione Philosophiæ." | 2001 | 1 |
| 7 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 8 | Alfred's Metres of Boethius | 1994 | 1 |
| 9 | The theological tractates | 1962 | 1 |
| 10 | King Alfred's Anglo-Saxon version of Boethius De consolatione philosophiae | 2008 | 0 |
| 11 | Boethius's "In Ciceronis Topica": An Annotated Translation of a Medieval Dialectical Text | 1988 | 0 |
| 12 | 2019 | 0 |
About Boethius
Boethius is a scholar working on Classics, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, Religious studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 74 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Medieval European Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (22 citations), Philosophy (21 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations), Religious studies (8 citations) and History (16 citations). Frequent co-authors include H. F. Stewart, Edward Kennard Rand, James J. O’Donnell, S. J. Tester, Eleonore Stump and Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew), Cornell University Press eBooks, Oxford University Press eBooks and The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.