Boethius
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Philosophy top 10%
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Papers in
- Classics 7
- Medieval Literature and History 7
-
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
- Co-authors
- James J. O’Donnell (1 shared paper)Edward Kennard Rand (2 shared papers)H. F. Stewart (2 shared papers)S. J. Tester (1 shared paper)Eleonore Stump (2 shared papers)Griffiths (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association (1 paper)Cornell University Press eBooks (1 paper)Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Boethius
7 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Classics 38
- Philosophy 31
- Religious studies 12
- Geography, Planning and Development 12
- History 21
Countries citing papers authored by Boethius
This map shows the geographic impact of Boethius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boethius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boethius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Boethius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boethius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boethius. The network helps show where Boethius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Boethius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 59 | |
| 2 | 1973 | 28 | |
| 3 | King Alfred's Old English Version of Boethius de Consolatione Philosophiae | 2009 | 19 |
| 4 | New Directions in Boethian Studies | 2007 | 2 |
| 5 | The theological tractates | 1962 | 2 |
| 6 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 7 | Chaucer's Translation of Boethius's "De Consolatione Philosophiæ." | 2001 | 1 |
| 8 | Alfred's Metres of Boethius | 1994 | 1 |
| 9 | Boethius: The Theological Tractates | 2017 | 1 |
| 10 | King Alfred's Anglo-Saxon version of Boethius De consolatione philosophiae | 2008 | 0 |
| 11 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 12 | Boethius's "In Ciceronis Topica": An Annotated Translation of a Medieval Dialectical Text | 1988 | 0 |
About Boethius
Boethius is a scholar working on Classics, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, Religious studies and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 115 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (7 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Medieval European Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (38 citations), Philosophy (31 citations), Religious studies (12 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (12 citations) and History (21 citations). Frequent co-authors include James J. O’Donnell, Edward Kennard Rand, H. F. Stewart, S. J. Tester, Eleonore Stump and Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Medical Entomology and Zoology, The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Cornell University Press eBooks and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.