Max Lüthi
Impact in
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Themes in Literature Analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
Papers in
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 8
- German Literature and Culture Studies 8
- Themes in Literature Analysis 1
- Classics 10
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 9
Max Lüthi
14 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 138
- Gender Studies 54
- General Arts and Humanities 5
- Classics 9
- Philosophy 26
Countries citing papers authored by Max Lüthi
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Lüthi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Lüthi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Lüthi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max Lüthi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Lüthi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Lüthi. The network helps show where Max Lüthi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Max Lüthi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The European folktale: Form and nature | 1982 | 52 |
| 2 | Once upon a Time; On the Nature of Fairy Tales. | 1970 | 51 |
| 3 | 1983 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 32 | |
| 5 | Das Volksmärchen als Dichtung : Ästhetik und Anthropologie | 1975 | 5 |
| 6 | 1964 | 4 | |
| 7 | Volksmärchen und Volkssage : zwei Grundformen erzählender Dichtung | 1961 | 3 |
| 8 | 1967 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1963 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 13 | So leben sie noch heute : Betrachtungen zum Volksmärchen | 1969 | 1 |
| 14 | Weltliteratur und Volksliteratur : acht Beiträgevon Richard Alewyn, Werner Habicht, Clemens Heselhaus, Walter Hinck, Hans Hinterhäuser, Victor Lange, Max Lüthi und Horst Rüdiger | 1972 | 1 |
| 15 | 1960 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 1 |
About Max Lüthi
Max Lüthi is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Language and Linguistics, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (9 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (8 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (8 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (3 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper) and European history and politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (138 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations), General Arts and Humanities (5 citations), Classics (9 citations) and Philosophy (26 citations). Frequent co-authors include Regina Bendix, John D. Niles, W. F. H. Nicolaisen, Jon Erickson, Elizabeth Tucker and Johannes A. Gaertner. Their work appears in journals such as Western Folklore, Journal of American Folklore, The Modern Language Review, The German Quarterly and Fabula.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.