Max Krucoff

35 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Max Krucoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 220
  • Neurology 55
  • Neurology 96
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
Replace André Messias with:
André Messias Brazil
Wilhelm Eisner Austria
Gianpiero Tamburrini Italy
Giovanna Squintani Italy
Ahmed M. Raslan United States
Anne‐Lise Poirrier Belgium
Andrew J. Kobets United States
Matthew K. Mian United States
S. Felber Austria
John P. Sheppard United States
Max Krucoff relative to André Messias Brazil André Messias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
André Messias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Krucoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Krucoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Krucoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Krucoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Krucoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Krucoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Krucoff. The network helps show where Max Krucoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Krucoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Krucoff Line = papers co-authored together Max Krucoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016126
2 201377
3 201764
4 201463
5 202042
6 201133
7 201825
8 201724
9 201824
10 201622
11 202019
12 202112
13 201311
14 202110
15 20188
16 20237
17 20176
18 20246
19 20206
20 20186

About Max Krucoff

Max Krucoff is a scholar working on Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Surgery and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (5 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (220 citations), Neurology (55 citations), Neurology (96 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations). Max Krucoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Shervin Rahimpour, Dennis A. Turner, Marc W. Slutzky, V. Reggie Edgerton, Stephen C. Harward, Carrie R. Muh, Anil Cherian, Lee E. Miller, Carlos A. Bagley and Dario J. Englot. Their work appears in journals such as World Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurophysiology, Neurosurgery, Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Brain stimulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact