Max Diem

9.8k citations
159 papers · 7.8k · h-index 52

Impact in

  • Biophysics top 0.01%
    • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
    • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Papers in

Max Diem

156 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

Max Diem
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Biophysics 4.8k
  • Analytical Chemistry 3.2k
  • Spectroscopy 1.2k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 533
  • Molecular Biology 2.6k
Replace Henry H. Mantsch with:
Henry H. Mantsch Canada
Igor K. Lednev United States
Ira W. Levin United States
Erik Goormaghtigh Belgium
Małgorzata Barańśka Poland
Peter Gardner United Kingdom
Bayden R. Wood Australia
Rohit Bhargava United States
Henry H. Mantsch Canada
Michel Manfait France
Max Diem relative to Henry H. Mantsch Canada Henry H. Mantsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Henry H. Mantsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Diem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Diem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Diem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Diem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Diem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Diem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Diem. The network helps show where Max Diem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Diem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Diem Line = papers co-authored together Max Diem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004341
2 1999282
3 2004233
4 2007205
5 2005198
6 2011187
7 2004185
8 2013173
9 2001165
10 1998160
11 2002155
12 2008154
13
Vibrational Spectroscopy for Medical Diagnosis
2008146
14 1999141
15 2010137
16 2006134
17 2011133
18 1982106
19 2009101
20 2012100

About Max Diem

Max Diem is a scholar working on Biophysics, Analytical Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 159 papers that have together received 7.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (99 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (65 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (35 papers), Infrared Thermography in Medicine (29 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (26 papers), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (15 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (12 papers) and AI in cancer detection (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (4.8k citations), Analytical Chemistry (3.2k citations), Spectroscopy (1.2k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (533 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.6k citations). Max Diem has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Miloš D. Miljković, Melissa Romeo, Christian Matthäus, Luis Chiriboga, Peter Lasch, Susie Boydston‐White, Benjamin Bird, T. V. Chernenko, Laurence A. Nafié and Herman Yee. Their work appears in journals such as The Analyst, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biopolymers, Applied Spectroscopy and Journal of Biophotonics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact