Max Berg

566 citations
23 papers · 294 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Max Berg

20 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Max Berg
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • General Psychology 8
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 13
  • Clinical Psychology 76
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 60
Replace Asuka Yoshimi with:
Asuka Yoshimi Japan
Valentina Pugliese Italy
Alessia Donati Switzerland
Johannes Sebastian Wrege Switzerland
R. Neufeld United States
Remy Flechais United Kingdom
Angela J. Pereira‐Morales Colombia
Catherine E. Prado Australia
Sing Lee United States
Michael M.C. Wong China
Max Berg relative to Asuka Yoshimi Japan Asuka Yoshimi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Asuka Yoshimi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Berg. The network helps show where Max Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Berg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Berg Line = papers co-authored together Max Berg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018100
2 202062
3 202425
4 202322
5 202218
6 202410
7 19699
8 20249
9 20237
10 20246
11 19755
12 20255
13 20243
14 20253
15 20242
16 20242
17 20252
18
A new factor in the blood of patients with peptic ulcer. Distribution in blood fractions.
19751
19 20221
20 20221

About Max Berg

Max Berg is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (8 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (60 citations). Max Berg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tobias Κube, Bodo Warrings, Martin J. Herrmann, Philipp Herzog, Birgit Kleim, Winfried Rief, Lukas Kirchner, Stefan G. Hofmann, Geoffrey M. Reed and Johannes Zimmermann. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Schizophrenia Research, Gut and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact