Maureen E. Smith

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Maureen E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 575
  • Genetics 434
  • Health Informatics 19
  • General Health Professions 215
  • Physiology 217
Replace Melinda C. Aldrich with:
Melinda C. Aldrich United States
Mina S. Sedrak United States
Sharyl J. Nass United States
Carol P. Somkin United States
Amy A. Lemke United States
Christoph Gerlinger Germany
Nicki Tiffin South Africa
Rebecca D. Pentz United States
Patricia A. Deverka United States
Amyé Tevaarwerk United States
Maureen E. Smith relative to Melinda C. Aldrich United States Melinda C. Aldrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Melinda C. Aldrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maureen E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maureen E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maureen E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maureen E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maureen E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maureen E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maureen E. Smith. The network helps show where Maureen E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maureen E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maureen E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Maureen E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010206
2 2015145
3 199481
4 201277
5 201359
6 201155
7 201743
8 201039
9 201838
10 201436
11 201434
12 202024
13 201622
14 201222
15 202021
16 201720
17 201319
18 202118
19 202118
20 201818

About Maureen E. Smith

Maureen E. Smith is a scholar working on Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Cancer Research, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (18 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (15 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (15 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (575 citations), Genetics (434 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations), General Health Professions (215 citations) and Physiology (217 citations). Maureen E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amy A. Lemke, Jeni Hebert‐Beirne, W.A. Wolf, Ellen Wright Clayton, Saskia C. Sanderson, Ingrid A. Holm, Sharon Aufox, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison, Nila A Sathe and Armand H. Matheny Antommaria. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics in Medicine, ChemCatChem, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact