Matty de Wit
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Animal Virus Infections Studies
Papers in
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 3
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 4
- Child Abuse and Trauma 2
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 2
- Co-authors
- Marion Koopmans (2 shared papers)Jan Vinjé (2 shared papers)Yvonne van Duynhoven (2 shared papers)Erwin de Bruin (1 shared paper)Barry Rockx (1 shared paper)Harry Vennema (1 shared paper)Wim van der Poel (1 shared paper)Niek Klazinga (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychiatric Services (2 papers)Clinical Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Harm Reduction Journal (1 paper)BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)Child Abuse & Neglect (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Matty de Wit
17 papers receiving 686 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Infectious Diseases 510
- Animal Science and Zoology 156
- Hepatology 114
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 178
- General Health Professions 107
Countries citing papers authored by Matty de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of Matty de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matty de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matty de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matty de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matty de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matty de Wit. The network helps show where Matty de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matty de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 371 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 153 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1 |
About Matty de Wit
Matty de Wit is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 17 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (510 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (156 citations), Hepatology (114 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (178 citations) and General Health Professions (107 citations). Matty de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marion Koopmans, Jan Vinjé, Yvonne van Duynhoven, Erwin de Bruin, Barry Rockx, Harry Vennema, Wim van der Poel, Niek Klazinga, Thijs Fassaert and Steve Lauriks. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Harm Reduction Journal, BMC Health Services Research and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.