Matthias Klauda

590 citations
28 papers · 472 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Matthias Klauda

25 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Matthias Klauda
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Condensed Matter Physics 370
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 194
  • Geophysics 39
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 65
  • Materials Chemistry 84
Replace R. Ogawa with:
R. Ogawa Japan
M. A. Quijada United States
J. L. Cobb United States
N. Tellmann Germany
X. D. Wu United States
Zhigang Zhao China
Bing Liang Germany
Jörg Beuers Germany
V. Plechác̆ek Czechia
Takafumi Aomine Japan
Matthias Klauda relative to R. Ogawa Japan R. Ogawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
R. Ogawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Klauda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Klauda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Klauda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Klauda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Klauda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Klauda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Klauda. The network helps show where Matthias Klauda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthias Klauda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthias Klauda Line = papers co-authored together Matthias Klauda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993161
2 200071
3 199044
4 198942
5 199031
6 199522
7 199117
8 199915
9 198911
10 199311
11 19949
12 19918
13 19908
14 19913
15 20023
16 20152
17 19942
18 19992
19 20082
20 20152

About Matthias Klauda

Matthias Klauda is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Hardware and Architecture and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (22 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (13 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (5 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (4 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (4 papers), Copper-based nanomaterials and applications (3 papers) and Real-Time Systems Scheduling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (370 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (194 citations), Geophysics (39 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (65 citations) and Materials Chemistry (84 citations). Matthias Klauda has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include G. Saemann‐Ischenko, Julian Strobel, Jürgen Markl, S. Kolesov, Heinz J. Chaloupka, Shinichi Uchida, Z. Y. Li, Zhiwei Hu, E. Pellegrin and N. Nücker. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physica B Condensed Matter, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Japanese Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact