Matthew Wright

529 citations
43 papers · 401 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Wright

40 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Matthew Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Aerospace Engineering 228
  • Computational Mechanics 136
  • Signal Processing 57
  • Environmental Engineering 61
  • Biomedical Engineering 155
Replace J.-P. Dalmont with:
J.-P. Dalmont France
W.M. Beltman United States
Manuel Melon France
Jacques Cuenca Belgium
A. Hirschberg Netherlands
Randolph H. Cabell United States
Hans–Elias de Bree Netherlands
Kaushik Saha India
Benoı̂t Fabre France
Hadrien Bériot Belgium
Matthew Wright relative to J.-P. Dalmont France J.-P. Dalmont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
J.-P. Dalmont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Wright. The network helps show where Matthew Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Wright Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200551
2 200746
3 200724
4 201723
5 200421
6 200820
7 199720
8 200319
9 200418
10 201115
11 199515
12 200515
13 200214
14 201512
15 200610
16 20148
17 20017
18 20077
19 19987
20 20006

About Matthew Wright

Matthew Wright is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (15 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (11 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (9 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (7 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (5 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (228 citations), Computational Mechanics (136 citations), Signal Processing (57 citations), Environmental Engineering (61 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (155 citations). Matthew Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include C.L. Morfey, Alan McAlpine, P.A. Nelson, José Antunes, George Tzanetakis, Stefan Bleeck, Sébastien Guérin, Ian M. Winter, Tobias Goehring and Jessica J. M. Monaghan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sound and Vibration, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, AIAA Journal, Nature Physics and International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact