Julia Sarant

2.4k citations
67 papers · 1.8k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Sarant

58 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Julia Sarant
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Sensory Systems 352
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 580
  • Speech and Hearing 200
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
Replace Shani Dettman with:
Shani Dettman Australia
Johanna G. Nicholas United States
Amy McConkey Robbins United States
Jean S. Moog United States
Marilyn E. Demorest United States
Gail D. Chermak United States
Mathias Hällgren Sweden
Phillip M. Gilley United States
Derek M. Houston United States
Mridula Sharma Australia
Julia Sarant relative to Shani Dettman Australia Shani Dettman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Shani Dettman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Sarant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Sarant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Sarant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Sarant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Sarant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Sarant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Sarant. The network helps show where Julia Sarant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Sarant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Sarant Line = papers co-authored together Julia Sarant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001389
2 2001141
3 2014113
4 2015107
5 2020100
6 200894
7 200176
8 201370
9 201970
10 201055
11 200240
12 200737
13 200336
14
Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
199736
15 200228
16 201726
17 199422
18 201922
19 200521
20 200420

About Julia Sarant

Julia Sarant is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Sensory Systems and Occupational Therapy, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (48 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (22 papers), Noise Effects and Management (13 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Language Development and Disorders (7 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (6 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (352 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (580 citations), Speech and Hearing (200 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations). Julia Sarant has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Blamey, David Harris, Richard C. Dowell, Louise Paatsch, Catherine Bow, J Barry, Graeme M. Clark, Peter A. Busby, Roger Wales and Rebecca Tooher. Their work appears in journals such as Ear and Hearing, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, International Journal of Audiology, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact