Matthew Wagers

3.4k citations
37 papers · 2.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Wagers

35 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Matthew Wagers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Developmental Neuroscience 288
  • Language and Linguistics 825
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 657
  • Linguistics and Language 155
Replace G. A. Ojemann with:
G. A. Ojemann United States
Debra L. Mills United States
Antonio Benítez‐Burraco Spain
Dan Drai Israel
Joanne Taylor United Kingdom
Dianne F. Newbury United Kingdom
Fiona Tweedie United Kingdom
Jason W. Bohland United States
Lori L. Holt United States
Daniel Flickinger United States
Matthew Wagers relative to G. A. Ojemann United States G. A. Ojemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
G. A. Ojemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Wagers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Wagers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Wagers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Wagers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Wagers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Wagers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Wagers. The network helps show where Matthew Wagers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Wagers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Wagers Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Wagers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009428
2 2001324
3 2008222
4 2012181
5 2013142
6 2009101
7 201191
8 201374
9 201461
10 201161
11 201552
12 201237
13 201428
14 201227
15 201821
16 201320
17 201819
18 201817
19 202017
20 201615

About Matthew Wagers

Matthew Wagers is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 37 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (22 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (14 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Language Development and Disorders (7 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers) and Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (288 citations), Language and Linguistics (825 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (657 citations) and Linguistics and Language (155 citations). Matthew Wagers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and China. Frequent co-authors include Colin Phillips, Ellen Lau, Jon Sprouse, Elizabeth Gould, N.K. Vail, Charles G. Gross, Mark J. Burish, Patrick R. Hof, Samuel S.‐H. Wang and Lex C. Towns. Their work appears in journals such as Language, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Memory and Language, Cognition and Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact