Matthew Schroeder

1.0k citations
13 papers · 765 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis 2
    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 2
    • Animal testing and alternatives 2

Matthew Schroeder

13 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Matthew Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 94
  • Oncology 260
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 49
  • Cancer Research 140
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 82
Replace Nathan J. Hellyer with:
Nathan J. Hellyer United States
Min Bao China
R. Montz Germany
Michael Lopez United States
Peter Chan Australia
Takashi Hatano Japan
Dagmar‐C. Fischer Germany
Takehito Sasaki Japan
Kristin Delfino United States
Andy Kin On Wong Canada
Matthew Schroeder relative to Nathan J. Hellyer United States Nathan J. Hellyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Nathan J. Hellyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Schroeder. The network helps show where Matthew Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2010178
2 2008134
3 2015100
4 199797
5 200977
6 201459
7 201057
8 201622
9 201516
10 19969
11 20158
12 20167
13 20211

About Matthew Schroeder

Matthew Schroeder is a scholar working on Oncology, Small Animals, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Immunology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 765 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (2 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (2 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper) and Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (94 citations), Oncology (260 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (49 citations), Cancer Research (140 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (82 citations). Matthew Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul Blount, Ching Kung, James H. Lambert, Ellen Yard, Christy L. Collins, R. Dawn Comstock, Sarah K. Fields, Daniel W. Visscher, Wilma L. Lingle and Robert B. Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicologic Pathology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and The Lancet Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact