Nathan J. Hellyer

21 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers

Nathan J. Hellyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Oncology 238
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 151
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
  • Rehabilitation 40
  • Immunology and Allergy 32
Replace Raphael M. Pfeffer with:
Raphael M. Pfeffer Israel
Terri Haddix United States
John F. McConville United States
Karen A. Osborne United States
Kathryn C. Behling United States
C Hanusch Germany
Bang‐Ning Lee United States
Linda McCullagh United States
Dimitrios Tzachanis United States
Jiani Wu China
Nathan J. Hellyer relative to Raphael M. Pfeffer Israel Raphael M. Pfeffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Raphael M. Pfeffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan J. Hellyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan J. Hellyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan J. Hellyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan J. Hellyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan J. Hellyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan J. Hellyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan J. Hellyer. The network helps show where Nathan J. Hellyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan J. Hellyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan J. Hellyer Line = papers co-authored together Nathan J. Hellyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001128
2 1998120
3 2013103
4 199889
5 200863
6 201555
7 200951
8 201641
9 200634
10 199530
11 200827
12 201325
13 200724
14 201521
15 201216
16 201014
17 20146
18 20202
19 20221
20 20201

About Nathan J. Hellyer

Nathan J. Hellyer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rehabilitation, Oncology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (4 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (238 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (151 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations), Rehabilitation (40 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (32 citations). Nathan J. Hellyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John G. Koland, Kunrong Cheng, David A. Krause, James W. Youdas, John H. Hollman, Hong‐Hee Kim, Andrea J. Boon, Kathryn R. Cieslak, Gary C. Sieck and Carlos B. Mantilla. Their work appears in journals such as Anatomical Sciences Education, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Biochemical Journal, PM&R and Gene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact