Matthew Pelowski

3.4k citations
96 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Pelowski

90 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Matthew Pelowski
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Sensory Systems 336
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 734
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 253
  • Conservation 135
Replace Gerald C. Cupchik with:
Gerald C. Cupchik Canada
Martin Skov Denmark
Winfried Menninghaus Germany
Alexander P. Christensen United States
William Blizek United States
Cinzia Di Dio Italy
Emily C. Nusbaum United States
Aaron Kozbelt United States
Garrett Jaeger United States
Selçuk Acar United States
Matthew Pelowski relative to Gerald C. Cupchik Canada Gerald C. Cupchik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Gerald C. Cupchik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Pelowski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Pelowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Pelowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Pelowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Pelowski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Pelowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Pelowski. The network helps show where Matthew Pelowski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Pelowski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Pelowski Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Pelowski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017259
2 2016125
3 2010125
4 201788
5 201883
6 201073
7 201571
8 202164
9 201562
10 201859
11 201455
12 201754
13 201748
14 201746
15 201746
16 201745
17 202142
18 202340
19 201439
20 201837

About Matthew Pelowski

Matthew Pelowski is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Sensory Systems, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (63 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (21 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (18 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (13 papers), Color perception and design (12 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (11 papers), Art Education and Development (9 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Sensory Systems (336 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (734 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (253 citations) and Conservation (135 citations). Matthew Pelowski has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Leder, Patrick S. Markey, Tao Liu, Michael Forster, Gernot Gerger, Eva Specker, Javier Gordon Ogembo, Pablo P. L. Tinio, Dongchuan Yu and Raphaël Rosenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, Frontiers in Psychology, Physics of Life Reviews, PLoS ONE and Empirical Studies of the Arts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact