Matthew Mitchell

1.5k citations
51 papers · 921 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Mitchell

46 papers receiving 861 citations

Peers

Matthew Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 196
  • Economics and Econometrics 456
  • Strategy and Management 167
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Management Science and Operations Research 94
Replace Kai Man Kwan with:
Kai Man Kwan Hong Kong
Danijela Godinić Croatia
Diane H. Parente United States
Diana L. Deadrick United States
Paul Hünermund Denmark
Hannes Guenter Netherlands
Anis Khedhaouria France
Richard Z. Gooding United States
Matthew Mitchell relative to Kai Man Kwan Hong Kong Kai Man Kwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Kai Man Kwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Mitchell. The network helps show where Matthew Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010208
2 2006111
3 200867
4 200159
5 200558
6 200035
7 202131
8 200629
9 200126
10 201124
11
Innovation Variety and Patent Breadth
200123
12 200720
13 201519
14 200517
15 200815
16 201715
17 202015
18 200213
19 201613
20 202212

About Matthew Mitchell

Matthew Mitchell is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and Communication, having authored 51 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Firm Innovation and Growth (13 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (9 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (7 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers), Economic theories and models (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (196 citations), Economics and Econometrics (456 citations), Strategy and Management (167 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (94 citations). Matthew Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hugo A. Hopenhayn, Leaetta M. Hough, Brian H. Kim, Robert E. McGrath, Andrzej Skrzypacz, Gerard Llobet, April Franco, Andrea Moro, Gábor Virág and Galina Vereshchagina. Their work appears in journals such as The RAND Journal of Economics, Critical Criminology, Review of Economic Dynamics, International Economic Review and Crime Media Culture An International Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact