Matthew Jaffe

453 citations
10 papers · 296 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 8
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 2
    • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 7

Matthew Jaffe

10 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Matthew Jaffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Software 136
  • Hardware and Architecture 39
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 80
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 40
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 20
Replace Gilles Motet with:
Gilles Motet France
Viet Yen Nguyen Germany
David Pumfrey United Kingdom
Suhyun Cha Germany
Pepijn Crouzen Germany
Thomas Peikenkamp Germany
Matthias Güdemann Germany
Jean-Paul Bodeveix France
Benjamin Monate France
Bernhard Josko Germany
Matthew Jaffe relative to Gilles Motet France Gilles Motet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Gilles Motet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Jaffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Jaffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Jaffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Jaffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Jaffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Jaffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Jaffe. The network helps show where Matthew Jaffe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Jaffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Jaffe Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Jaffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1991153
2 201798
3 198927
4
Completeness, robustness, and safety in real-time software requirements specifications: a logical positivist looks at requirements engineering
19889
5 19893
6 20082
7 20211
8 19891
9 20031
10 20051

About Matthew Jaffe

Matthew Jaffe is a scholar working on Software, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 10 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Reliability and Analysis Research (8 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (7 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (3 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (2 papers), Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy (2 papers), Petri Nets in System Modeling (1 paper) and Software System Performance and Reliability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (136 citations), Hardware and Architecture (39 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (80 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (40 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (20 citations). Matthew Jaffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nancy G. Leveson, Mats P. E. Heimdahl, Dror Paley, Erik Hohmann, Cengiz Şen, D Maár, Vaida Glatt, Kevin Tetsworth and John E. Herzenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, eScholarship (California Digital Library) and ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact